🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an charming little “playful character”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a large but fiercely protective friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “endless energy” and wiggles like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “loving presence” with a kind nature.

Thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canadian entertainment facility have been caught in a disagreement between a closed attraction, government authorities and welfare campaigners.

But those most familiar with the whales say the heated debate over their fate often overlooks the nuances of the whales who, after growing up in confinement, have been carefully observed by the caretakers who see them each day.

After the national authorities blocked the transfer of the belugas to China, the embattled facility near Niagara Falls where they are held stated it would consider to put them down unless the government covers the upkeep of their survival. The nation’s marine resources official has denied that ultimatum, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable circumstance.

Intelligent Marine Mammals

Researchers say that belugas’ neural makeup, along with their sound replication, intellectual tasks and communal behavior point to they are highly cognitive creatures – something a former trainer observed first-hand.

She spent several years as a marine mammal specialist, a job that involved building relationships of the aquatic animals.

“Building up those relationships over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of affection. At the start, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so magical and gratifying.”

The trainer knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was nevertheless astounded by the subtleties and unique traits in their characters. She developed a deep bond for Eve and Cleopatra with opposing personalities.

“One whale chose me. The other demanded work,” she said. “Both changed the way I understand relationships.”

Public Concerns and Facility Decline

Burgess’s connection with the whales developed against a context of growing public opposition to their captivity.

During her tenure at the park, multiple belugas and the park’s single killer whale, Kiska, passed away. In total, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a toll which the facility ascribes to expected lifespan, but which advocates say points to the inadequate care in which they were maintained.

The facility did not admit visitors to the visitors over the recent season, but the former trainer says she witnessed firsthand effects of the shutdown. “Structural materials is falling apart from the pools because they’re in disrepair and not being maintained. The whales are inquisitive and so they grab fragments and navigate with chunks in their mouth. It’s heartbreaking to see.”

The facility did not reply to a request for comment, but in the past claimed: “The whales … receive far higher quality veterinary services and constant supervision than any individual in the United Kingdom, or other places.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was terminated from the facility in early March following the death of Eos, an sick beluga the employees had to euthanize. She said the park thought information of the death were shared to the news outlets and she was fired soon after.

The ambiguity over the whales’ outcome has left her and other caretakers in anguish. She says the park’s ultimatum to euthanize its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “practically unfeasible” endeavor, adding any plans to euthanize even a single beluga would require “immense manpower”, trucks and machinery.

“It’s impossible in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess supports calls for the whales to be taken promptly from the facility, with its deteriorating pools and dwindling staff.

In late September, Canada’s fisheries minister denied a proposal to export the whales to an overseas location.

“Allowing the proposal would have meant a continued existence in confinement and a reversion to display for amusement,” the minister commented. “As Canadians, we know that whales are meant for the sea, not in tanks for our entertainment. I could not in ethical standing approve an export that would continue the treatment these belugas have experienced.”

But the former trainer said the official’s remarks reflect a more general misunderstanding of the circumstances of existence for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The people needs to grasp these are whales that have lived entirely in captivity and they will need human care for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “The public just don’t understand that it’s not as simple as saying ‘close it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Continuing Discussion

As decision makers work to find a answer, suggestions have been put forward, some of which have questionable practicality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be freed into the wilds of the Arctic – where whales are a key source of nourishment for Indigenous peoples.

A proposed protected area in the province of Nova Scotia, which has received government approval, has been highly debated. The planned facility, which includes extensive space of enclosed sea water, remains undeveloped. Supporters remain hopeful that it could ultimately represent a long term solution for a number of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among caretakers she’s consulted, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “merely an untested concept” in the whales’ well-being.

Some experts say the idea of a refuge indicates a worldwide trend away from animal displays and could represent a feasible plan in the near future.

An official, leader of the plan, said the location will mimic the cognitive activities and feeding regimen the whales get from trainers, albeit in a more expansive environment. He said after the medical condition of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|